nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:34:09 -0500
Does it matter, for purposes of this discussion?Either way, you end up in the US, subject to trial. From there it's a simpler matter (albeit non-trivial) to try you in multiple states.
They could pass you around for years, if they did it right. Hell, look what they did to Mitnick, and they didn't even pass him around. At 09:26 PM 2/13/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> I am not alone in thinking that somebody is very likely to be dragged into > US custody yet again over this. is that "legally" dragged into US custody, or the standard amurikan "kidnap them, drag them to US soil" then arrest them?
Current thread:
- Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES Shawn McMahon (Feb 13)
- Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES Jim Mercer (Feb 13)
- Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES Bruce Campbell (Feb 13)
- Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES Shawn McMahon (Feb 14)
- Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEWCLUES Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 14)
- Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES scarter (Feb 15)
- Re: Fwd: [cfgeeks] HACKERS LEAVE A TRAIL OF CHAOS, BUT FEW CLUES Jim Mercer (Feb 13)