nanog mailing list archives
Generic filtering policies (was Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs!)
From: Lionel Lauer <longword () newsguy com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 03:16:09 +0800
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:11:22 -0700 (MST), Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM> wrote:
Make Inggress[sic] Filtering the LAW for all NANOG postings! It should eliminate 99.9% of DOS posters.
Well yeah, the post wasn't terribly helpful as it stood, but OTOH, it would certainly be helpful to have a 'model' client/peering agreement that includes some sort of reasonable standard for what kind of traffic should be filtered on ingress & egress. The only one I've seen thus far are the guidelines in Cisco's white-paper for ISPs, which (while extremely helpful) seem a little out of date these days. Is anyone interested in helping come up with some sort of standard model, or at least a set of guidelines? Or do people think such a thing would be unneccessary? -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Toplez Razer (Feb 11)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Sam Thomas (Feb 11)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Patrick Greenwell (Feb 11)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Patrick Greenwell (Feb 11)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Ehud Gavron (Feb 12)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Josh Richards (Feb 12)
- Generic filtering policies (was Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs!) Lionel Lauer (Feb 12)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 12)
- Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs! Sam Thomas (Feb 11)