nanog mailing list archives
Re: Audio Quality
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:59:37 -0500
David Brouda wrote:
Agreed, audio is better now. Also, the video bit-rate is more reasonable now (128kbps for a non-changing image, compared to 400kbps previously).
Both audio and video are much better now. Is there a proper email to reach the folks running the service for feedback/problem reports? One plea: please leave the video live (mute audio if desired) during lunch breaks and such. Real doesn't provide a very good methodology for finding out when a session is back... when you stop the live feed, the session ends, and attempts to reconnect tell you you've got a bad (old) URL.
At 4:38 PM -0500 2/7/00, CUNNINGHAM () PSC EDU wrote:>Also, the audio in the H.261 stream is a bit distorted. Perhaps the >input level to the machine generating the stream need to be turned >down? This seems to have improved. Thanks. I'm not getting any audio on the MPEG2 stream. Is it just me? Steve
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts () senie com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranthnetworks.com
Current thread:
- Audio Quality David Brouda (Feb 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Audio Quality David Brouda (Feb 07)
- Re: Audio Quality Daniel Senie (Feb 07)
- RE: Audio Quality Craig Labovitz (Feb 07)