nanog mailing list archives

Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss))


From: Travis Pugh <tpugh () shore net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 09:51:45 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, 17 Dec 2000 nanog () rmrf net wrote:


Depends on what class it's in.  Let me explain further.  Verio, in their
infinite wisdom, has decided that they are going to throw CIDR right out
the window.  We own 64.240.0.0-64.242.255.255.  We advertise MANY smaller
blocks of this space obviously, and what we have found is that in that
space (since it is "Class A" space, remember we don't know what CIDR is
since we're Verio) is that Verio does not accept anything smaller than a
/20.  Now many of our customers run BGP with us and advertise a /24 only,
I guess they're SOL as far as Verio is concerned (actually if it's
our space they're probably going to see the larger aggregate as
well, so it's not as big of a deal, but still mighty annoying).  Oh, and
did I mention that Verio isn't even one of our peers?  Oh well.


Maybe if you aggregated your announcements instead of feeding a /14 to us
as /22, /23, and /24 blocks, it wouldn't be necessary to do
minimum-allocation filtering.

-travis




Current thread: