nanog mailing list archives
RE: Packet Loss
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:21:42 -0800
From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob () harvard edu] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:52 AMCan we call on the Avian Carrier RFC here? Packet Loss maytake on a wholenew meaning here...especially for the bulk transfer mode
Never under-estimate the bandwidth of a mini-van filled with DLT tapes, on the freeway at 65 mph. - updated to current - rmeyer - original author unknown
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Scott Bradner (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss scott w (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Andrew Partan (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Joel Jaeggli (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Bennett Todd (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Larry Sheldon (Dec 14)
- monitoring Michael Long (Dec 14)