nanog mailing list archives
RE: California power - its cold, its dark
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () robotics net>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:07:36 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Roeland Meyer wrote:
Thanks for the links guys. Now, here's the summary. 1) California power load is still 10,000 MW below peak delivery of last Summer.
What happens next summer when there will be more demand? I don't see any new generation coming online anytime soon. I guess it is time to look at new turbine technology.
2) Slightly over 1/3 of the generation plants are down for "maintenance".
Sure :-) Lets make some money on the spot market time. One odd thing I did notice is that my voltage graphs in CA are very close to the load graphs on the caiso website.
<>
Nathan Stratton CTO, Exario Networks, Inc. nathan () robotics net nathan () exario net http://www.robotics.net http://www.exario.net
Current thread:
- California power - its cold, its dark Sean Donelan (Dec 07)
- Re: California power - its cold, its dark Nathan Stratton (Dec 07)
- Re: California power - its cold, its dark Dominic J. Eidson (Dec 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Roeland Meyer (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark grisha (Dec 07)
- Re: California power - its cold, its dark Brian Kifiak (Dec 07)
- Re: California power - its cold, its dark Matthew Kaufman (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Patrick Harrison (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Roeland Meyer (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Nathan Stratton (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Brian W. (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Nathan Stratton (Dec 07)
- RE: California power - its cold, its dark Nathan Stratton (Dec 07)
- RE[2]: California power - its cold, its dark Joe McGuckin (Dec 07)
- Re: California power - its cold, its dark Marshall Eubanks (Dec 08)
- Re: California power - its cold, its dark Nathan Stratton (Dec 07)