nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting)
From: "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad () nominum com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 17:49:31 -0700
With 15 POPs spread throughout the US and Europe, and more on the way, with exceedingly non-contiguous space obtained from 6 different upstreams, it would benefit ourselves as well as our many providers to have our own PI space.
I suspect the number of organizations who can claim "it would benefit ourselves as well as our many providers" will greatly exceed the number of available routing slots before IPv6 comes anywhere close to being significantly deployed. Rgds, -drc
Current thread:
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting, (continued)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Jason Slagle (Aug 31)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Greg A. Woods (Aug 31)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Edward S. Marshall (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting multics (Aug 29)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting John Fraizer (Aug 30)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting multics (Aug 30)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Steve Gibbard (Aug 30)
- IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Aug 30)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Ted Beatie (Aug 30)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) David R. Conrad (Aug 31)
- Re: IPv6 allocatin (was Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting) Jason Slagle (Aug 31)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting J Bacher (Aug 30)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting sigma (Aug 30)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Alec H. Peterson (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting jlewis (Aug 30)