nanog mailing list archives
Re[2]: TLD operations change
From: Joe McGuckin <joe () via net>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 17:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Of course, then NSI might have to worry about one of the folks it signed a cooperative agreement trying to claim it owned the zone files NSI hired it to act as an operator for :-)
I'm normally opposed to "outsourcing" but in this case outsourcing makes a lot of sense. NSI being the business owner of *ALL* the machines serving the GTLD zone files doesn't make a lot of sense. My basic objection is using a set of identically configured hardware and software managed by a single operation for a "distributed" system.
I'm simply opposed to NSI embedding themselves further into the infrastructure of the internet, making it that much harder to pry them loose once their contracts run out... -- Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications 994 San Antonio Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Phone: 650-969-2203 Cell: 650-207-0372 Fax: 650-969-2124
Current thread:
- TLD operations change Verd, Brad (Aug 01)
- Re: TLD operations change Patrick Evans (Aug 01)
- Re: TLD operations change Kurt Kayser (Aug 01)
- Re: TLD operations change Simon Leinen (Aug 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TLD operations change Sean Donelan (Aug 01)
- Re: TLD operations change Sean Donelan (Aug 01)
- Re[2]: TLD operations change Joe McGuckin (Aug 01)
- Re: Re[2]: TLD operations change Sean Donelan (Aug 01)