nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: )
From: "Sean Butler" <sbutler1 () tampabay rr com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:01:27 -0400
At 05:45 AM 9/22/99 -0700, Derek Balling wrote:So now, even the age-old "litmus test" of "how do I program my Cisco to
do
that?" is a bad one?Actually, in the case of service providers, this is exactly why the "cisco-nsp () puck nether net" was established. Well, it wasn't really established at that site, but that's where it migrated later. The list is available for discussion of cisco service provider specific discussions just like this one. If you want to talk about Juniper routers, on the other hand.... :-) :-)
There is a Juniper list at juniper-nsp () puck nether net, though it doesn't get alot of traffic... Subscriptions to: juniper-nsp-request () puck nether net /Sean __________________________________ Sean Butler, CCIE #3897 AT&T Global Services -- OpenNet Support Phone: 727-533-8830 Fax: 813-878-5475
Current thread:
- [no subject] Gerry McDonald (Sep 21)
- RE: Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 21)
- RE: Mike Leber (Sep 22)
- RE: Derek Balling (Sep 22)
- NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) dave o'leary (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) Majdi Abbas (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) john heasley (Sep 23)
- Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: ) Sean Butler (Sep 23)
- RE: Mike Leber (Sep 22)
- RE: Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 21)
- Re: your mail Stephen Sprunk (Sep 22)
- Re: your mail Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 22)
- Re: your mail Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 22)