nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS reference
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 05:03:05 -0700
in general, i agree. except for a quibble
The backbone should not take _any_ routing information from the leaf networks.
there are cases where one has to: o multi-homed customers who need to speak bgp. yes, one could 'cheat' and not listen to their announcements and static route them. but it is easier to get the safety by buildin acls from the routing databases. (and don't start ranting on that one:-) o pops where one's local complexity is sufficiently high, or router management is delegated, so that ibgp or confederation are the most reasonable ways to partition into managable pieces (remember the business model which drives my life). randy
Current thread:
- Re: IS-IS reference, (continued)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 14)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 14)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 15)
- Any known issues at Mae West ? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sep 15)
- Re: Any known issues at Mae West ? Jan Ahrent Czmok (Sep 15)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Vijay Gill (Sep 15)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 15)