nanog mailing list archives
Re: IS-IS reference
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:39:16 -0700
I think the right plan of action should be: a) design numbering plan allowing aggregation on per-location basis; b) design a dynamically-routed redundant backbone and c) attach tree-like access networks to the backbobne. The backbone should not take _any_ routing information from the leaf networks. It would also help to keep strict access controls, and separate backbone routers from leaf access routers, so only the authorized backbone engineers can change things in those. Leaf networks should do static routing, and no proxy ARP. This way any damage from badly behaving hosts or apps is limited to the segment they're on. And don't do multicasting. May be we should start defensive networking classes? :) --vadim
Current thread:
- IS-IS reference Jack Crowder (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Paul G. Donner (Sep 15)
- Re: IS-IS reference Jack Crowder (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IS-IS reference Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dana Hudes (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex Bligh (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 14)
- Re: IS-IS reference Vadim Antonov (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 14)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 14)
- Re: IS-IS reference Alex P. Rudnev (Sep 15)
- Any known issues at Mae West ? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Sep 15)
- Re: Any known issues at Mae West ? Jan Ahrent Czmok (Sep 15)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 13)
- Re: IS-IS reference Vijay Gill (Sep 15)
- Re: IS-IS reference Dave Cooper (Sep 15)