nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP and memory
From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 23:05:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Phillip Vandry wrote:
I think you are forgetting that these routes need to be stored in a data structure that allows fast queries as well as fast inserts and deletes. That index takes space, and your "sh ip bgp" doesn't show you that.
Doesn't Livingston/Lucent claim to be able to handle several full views in 32mb? What are they leaving out? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*| Spammers will be winnuked or System Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes Atlantic Net | to get the job done. _________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________
Current thread:
- BGP and memory Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Phillip Vandry (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Ryan K. Brooks (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory jlewis (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Ryan K. Brooks (Oct 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP and memory Ron Buchalski (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Jared Mauch (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Ron Buchalski (Oct 13)
- Re: BGP and memory Phillip Vandry (Oct 13)