nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8
From: Steve Rubin <ser () tch org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 12:43:05 -0800
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 11:50:57AM -0500, Richard Steenbergen wrote:
I might almost be happy, except this breaks the oh-so-nice filter of 64.0.0.0/2 at borders (effectively reduces random src spoofed attacks by 25%, and covers 127.0.0.0/8 as well). Go ARIN. </sarcasm>
The #'s have to come from somewhere, and 64/8 is just as good as any other chunk of address space. Maybe a charge of $1/yr should be imposed for all swamp space that is not currently annouced (or in one of the routing registries?). Think of all the unused address space that would be free when all the companies that are no longer in business don't pay their address space bill :). -- Steve Rubin, Packet Monkey & Pilot - ser () tch org - http://www.tch.org/~ser/
Current thread:
- ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Richard Jimmerson (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Richard Steenbergen (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Kai Schlichting (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Richard Steenbergen (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Steve Rubin (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Bruce Campbell (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Steve Rubin (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 bmanning (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Kai Schlichting (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Richard Steenbergen (Nov 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ARIN to Allocate from 64.0.0.0/8 Aleksi Suhonen (Nov 20)