nanog mailing list archives
Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection?
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () virgin relcom eu net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 05:40:45 +0300 (MSK)
yes-do-detection or no-we-want-the-problems-fixed. Comments appreciated.I think that most ISP's would prefer that problems were fixed.the choice seems o when it breaks, the noc gets the call, debugs it, and it gets fixed
'it get fixed' if the problem is inside the network controlled by the NOC. If not??
o when it breaks, the software does successive guesswork back-offs until it makes it through. the performance sucks big-time, the customer thinks the isp is at fault, but the noc does not get called and the real problem never gets fixed. randy
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow (+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager) (+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
Current thread:
- should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Vern Paxson (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Chris Cappuccio (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Jeff Mcadams (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Greg A. Woods (Nov 19)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Alex P. Rudnev (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: should TCPs do MTU black hole detection? Dave Morton (Nov 19)