nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ?
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:22:56 -0800 (PST)
We were thinking of adding this to our automated dns scripts ... but if nobody actually uses them, we don't want to spend time on it ...use LOC (rfc1876) instead. it's more or less the same, but with more info.Thanks for the pointer, then my next question will be ... Are any registering LOC for their routers/hosts ? Any visual traceroute or similar applications using this ? /Jesper --
Several, including a new tool from the caida folks. LOCs are good stuff. --bill
Current thread:
- RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? bmanning (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Jesper Skriver (Nov 15)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? David Hares (Nov 18)
- Re: RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ? Andrew Brown (Nov 15)