nanog mailing list archives
Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent.
From: Sam Thomas <sthomas () lart net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:23:58 +0000
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 02:46:59PM -0800, Michael Dillon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, David Brouda wrote:Didn't you co-write rfc2182? :) ^^^^^If someone writes down a good idea once, are they forever banned from mentioning it again?
and again, and again, and again. Those of us that work with Randy (Dave's one of us) have gotten to hear plenty about 1982, 2181, and 2182. You'd think he's proud of them. ;-)
Or are you concerned that Randy might get rich from the royalties on RFC 2182? ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2182.txt
we want a refund! :-) party on, Sam (ObNetOps: ethernet auto-negotion doesn't) -- Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. -- Henry Spencer
Current thread:
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent., (continued)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. I Am Not An Isp (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. John Fraizer (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 15)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Michael Dillon (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. David Brouda (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Jared Mauch (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Michael Dillon (Mar 14)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Sam Thomas (Mar 15)
- Re: InterNIC - We put the "I" in incompetent. Rich Sena (Mar 14)