nanog mailing list archives

Re: HP Openview Slowness.


From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 23:25:48 +0400 (MSD)


If you begin to use commercial soft after free one, then:
- don't drop free soft, ypu'll use it anyway;
- increase memory, CPU and disk up to 2 - 4 times (if you had 64RAM, 
install 512);
- be ready to be disappointed;

Through HP OV is not bad piece of software.


On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Scott Call wrote:

Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 12:08:52 -0700
From: Scott Call <scall () devolution com>
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: HP Openview Slowness.


Hello.

    As part of a network I'm working on, I've install HPOpenView NNM
(first time, I've only used free/cheap stuff in the past) on a Sun
Ultra5, and it's performance is less than stellar.  It takes between 30
seconds and 5 minutes to traverse from one map to another (either up or
down).  This occurs no matter how many (or few) objects are on each
submap.

My two questions are:

1> Is this normal (or did I do something wrong with the software setup)
2> If you are running NNM, what platform are you using, and do you find
it satisfactory in responsiveness/etc.

Thanks!
-Scott




Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)




Current thread: