Re: Route-Reflector Redundancy

[Andrew R Frame <aframe () employees org>]

On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Brandon Applegate wrote:

> Greetings all,
>
> In a redundant RR design, I have several questions that don't seem to be
> clearly covered in RFC1966.
>
> 1)    Does a given route-reflector have to peer with the other
>       route-reflectors in its own cluster ??

yes

> 2)    If yes to 1), do the RRs in the cluster peer with each other as
>       clients or non-clients ??

non-clients

> 3)    If no to all of the above, do you just put X numbers of route
>       reflectors into the AS and each client etc. in the cluster now
>       peers with X # of RR's ?
>
> Above and beyond all of the above (actually depending on all of the above
> :) ), if my client router hears something from RR1, will it also hear it
> from RR2 ??  Is there a race condition ? 

Why dont you setup multiple clusters and have one rr for each cluster? it
is possible to have more then one rr per cluster.. but i dont know if this
is what you want to do.


latah,
-andrew

> Thanks in advance.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Brandon Applegate, CCNA  :  Network Administrator
> http://www.one.net       :  brandon () one net
> --------------------------------------------------