nanog mailing list archives
Re: Vendor Support Clue/NOC Clue
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:36:32 -0700
On 06/25/99, "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc () iMach com> wrote:
Here's the real thinker.... Is there a way that a company could set up their support lines so that "normal customers" get "1st level support reps" and "advanced (clueful) customers" get "2nd or higher level support reps"? Every time I think of an option, I can see a fatal flaw. Separate numbers would be abused. Certifications are expensive and mean nothing. And so on. There HAS to be a solution, we just haven't thought of it yet.
I used to work for a company which had (for historical reasons) both dialup and dedicated (leased line) customers. The dialup customers would call dialup support; the dedicated customers and our peers were supposed to call the NOC. These days, many companies make it very hard to find their NOC number -- probably for fear of irate dialup users tying up the phone lines. This also makes it difficult for peers to find somebody smart enough to understand the phrase "I'm not a customer, we peer with you" -- or, often more urgent, "I'm not a customer, but one of your customers is attacking one of my customers." ---------========== J.D. Falk <jdfalk () cybernothing org> =========--------- | "That article and its poster have been canceled." | | -David B. O'Donnell, Sysadmin, America OnLine | ----========== http://www.cybernothing.org/jdfalk/home.html ==========----
Current thread:
- Vendor Support Clue/NOC Clue Forrest W. Christian (Jun 25)
- Re: Vendor Support Clue/NOC Clue Michael L. Barrow (Jun 26)
- RE: Vendor Support Clue/NOC Clue James D. Wilson (Jun 26)
- Re: Vendor Support Clue/NOC Clue J.D. Falk (Jun 28)