nanog mailing list archives
RE: This is not good news.
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:31:14 -0700
Hank, This is off-topic for NANOG. But, while you are not completely wrong, you are not properly informed either. New top-level domains are NOT strictly administrative. If they were, or the root-servers were, we'd have had them over two years ago. Switch off your flame-thrower and come and join the festivities on the DOMAIN-POLICY list. Dean Robb did.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 1:52 AM To: linneweh () concentric net; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: This is not good news. At 15:38 23/06/99 -0700, Henry R. Linneweh wrote:Betsy Hart: Shadowy group is taking control of Internet! http://www.azstarnet.com/public/dnews/0623CV2.html Imposition of taxes and other power plays. Seems like history repeating itself and setting a dangerous precedent. Taxation of the network and making US citizens bare the brunt of the cost is UNACCEPTABLE PERIOD. Increasing rates to ISP's and backbone providers is and reverse method of taxation on the consumer in the end for government benefit, UNACCEPTABLE PERIOD.<flame> Oh please! NSI is playing every one of you for saps. Follow the money. Who is making money right now by the delay? Not ICANN. A tax? You have got to be kidding. It is a cost to cover expenses - might be $.50, might even $.30. Go ahead - put a cap put on the cost of running ICANN. Build a different cost model to support the operation of ICANN. Oh wait - ARIN has one. No one calls the fee ISPs pay ARIN - a form of taxation. Calling it a tax is playing into NSI's hands. Internet governance? Another nice buzzword thrown around to make people shy away from ICANN. ICANN has nothing to do with encryption, copyright, taxation, censorship, etc. Those who want to torpedo ICANN and to put the whole process back by 2 years - want you to think that ICANN can and will do all those things. Assigning domain names is administrative. Don't let anyone convince you otherwise. You don't like cybersquatters or trademark bandits? Take them to court. Leave ICANN (and NSI for that matter) out of it. </flame> -HankHenry
Current thread:
- This is not good news. Henry R. Linneweh (Jun 23)
- Re: This is not good news. Steven J. Sobol (Jun 23)
- ICANN (was Re: This is not good news.) J.D. Falk (Jun 23)
- Re: This is not good news. Hank Nussbacher (Jun 23)
- RE: This is not good news. Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 24)
- RE: This is not good news. Dean Robb (Jun 25)
- RE: This is not good news. Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 24)