nanog mailing list archives
Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications
From: "Michael P. Lyle" <icee () phoenix lyle org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:48:14 -0800
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 09:35:13PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
o does anyone see why the exchange address space needs to be globally routable?Traceroute.as the fabric is used for peering under bi-lats, if we each announce the mesh to our customers and not to our peers, then i believe you will have your tracroutes and yet the prefix does not have to be globally routable, e.g. could be 209.666.42/24. randy
Holdon, i don't even see the need for that; if you traceroute out, the packets will cross the exchange irregardless of whether you're announcing it to your customers, and a message of TTL exceeded will be generated from the exchange's address.. The important question is, should they be globally UNIQUE for troubleshooting purposes? I think so. Mike -- Michael P. Lyle Security Architect Exodus Communications
Current thread:
- aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Michael P. Lyle (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Stephen Stuart (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Alan Hannan (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Jessica Yu (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Abha Ahuja (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Richard Irving (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Kevin Oberman (Jan 25)