nanog mailing list archives

RE: ATM Switch Interoperability Fixed!


From: "Webb, Tremayne" <TWebb () mercury balink com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:33:04 -0500

It appears that the FORE ASX1000 switches and Ascend Switches do some
manipulation of the settings you give them. The Ascend switches allocate
[SCR (in cells)] * 1.35 as your CAC (Connection Admission Control) and
leaves the PCR untouched. The ASX1000 allocates it as [SCR (in cells)] *
1.75 and leaves the PCR untouched. We recalculated the SCRs to equal out
and this solved the problem.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trey Webb
Sr. NOC Engineer
BA Global Networks, Inc.
703-295-4407
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Bligh [mailto:amb () gxn net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 12:08 PM
To: Steve Murray
Cc: Martin, Christian; danny () qwest net; nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: ATM Switch Interoperability 


Steve,

Formula looks great (interesting). However certainly (Cisco) AIP's don't
traffic
shape sufficiently accurately for (Cisco) BPX's not to cause the
occassional discard. I figured Lightstreams might be the same.
In our case the relevant supplier changed CDVT and it fixed this.

-- 
Alex Bligh
GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)




Current thread: