nanog mailing list archives
Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?)
From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 23:04:59 -0700 (MST)
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, Lawrence A. Deleski wrote:
Agreed, but the question remains whether threads like the one I posted (Exodus) or ones similar to that have a place on NANOG. After all that I'm not so sure. Threads on NANOG usually deal with issues that affect *all* providers globally, not just one. Randy summed it up nicely in three or
[...]
/lad
I'll have you know that I spent a good hour writing my argument to support your position, and there you go taking all the steam out of it ;) But it got me reminiscing of the high school debate team days... Pete.
Current thread:
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Lawrence A. Deleski (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) David Diaz (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Tim Wolfe (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Ehud Gavron (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) J.D. Falk (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 05)
- Re: Please be nice... (Was Re: Exodus?) Alan Spicer (Jan 05)