nanog mailing list archives

Re: Mail "HACKs"


From: Martin Cooper <mjc () cooper org uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 04:03:54 +0000

Piete Brookes <piete.brookes () cl cam ac uk> writes:

It appears that once again you seem to have b*ggered things up with your
mail HACKs, it that you sent messages to "teaching-research () cl cam ac uk"
but the RFC 822 headers had:

      From: Martin Cooper <mjc () cooper org uk>
      To: janet-ip () warwick ac uk
      Cc: anne.campbell.mp () dial pipex com, rpa () insnet net
      Subject: Re: relevance of MTCP email to janet-ip
      Message-Id: <E10GWjP-0000aI-00 () nmg2 csi cam ac uk>
      Sender: Martin Cooper <mjc64 () ucs cam ac uk>

and

      From: Martin Cooper <mjc () cooper org uk>
      To: John.Dyer () ukerna ac uk
      Cc: janet-ip () warwick ac uk, rpa () insnet net
      Message-Id: <E10GWgV-0000aG-00 () nmg2 csi cam ac uk>
      Sender: Martin Cooper <mjc64 () ucs cam ac uk>

i.e. no reason at all to go to *every* member of T&R.

Can you pelase explain what is going on, and what steps you are going to
take to avoid any recurrances ?

I would have thought after the last incident, you would have taken somewhat
more care !

Piete,

I would have thought (and would like to believe) that you (of all people)
would recognise the basic absolute human-right to freedom of speech.

Distressingly, or so it would seem, you appear unprepared to grant me this
basic right (albeit that my emails will attract unwelcome attention, and
cause much political weight to be brought to bear upon my head come Monday
morning).

RFC 822 (as extensively documented by the late Dr. Jonathan Postel founder
of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) specifies the "Bcc:",
also widely known as the "Blind Carbon Copy" header, intended to allow the
(E)SMTP mail sender to specify priviledged recipients to whom an email may
be sent, with a view to keeping the nature of such primary recipients of a
message unaware of the extent of the distribution of the message, for
whatever, tactful, political, or otherwise reasons unknown.

If I am required to resign because I express unpopular, or politically
non-expedient views, by whatever means, then so be it. I feel that it
would not be unreasonable to hope that the wider Internet community
would sympathise with me, and permit me to earn my living through my
desire to further the goals of that community, by working with whoever
may feel minded to give me house room.


Martin Cooper
Taking much care to express my views, as ever, for myself...



Current thread: