nanog mailing list archives
Re: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd)
From: Dean Robb <pceasy () norfolk infi net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 01:29:36 -0500
At 07:12 2/24/99 -0800, Eric Germann wrote:
Dear NANOG readers, should I edit the archives and the search engine? Should I become an "offensive material editor" for any and all parties Eric
Uh, no. They're full of male bovine fecal matter. IF they could convince some shyster to file a suit, it'd never make it...archivists are well-protected under US law. Ignore them. Nobody probably would have looked at the allegedly offensive page if they weren't making a production number of it. "Small minds can only contemplate small ideas".....Unknown Dean Robb Owner, PC-EASY (757) 495-EASY [3279] On-site computer repair, upgrades and consultations Read my game reviews/columns in SimOps on WWW.TheGamers.Net
Current thread:
- Re: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd) Eric Germann (Feb 24)
- Re: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd) Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- RE: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd) James D. Wilson (Feb 24)
- Re: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd) Dean Robb (Feb 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd) James D. Wilson (Feb 24)
- RE: http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9711/msg00129.html (fwd) James D. Wilson (Feb 25)