nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Policies
From: Tim Wolfe <tim () clipper net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Paul Ferguson wrote:
At 01:40 PM 4/22/99 -0700, Tim Wolfe wrote:How does this figure into the future political and technical growth of the net? Wouldn't this type of apathy tend to push toward government involvement in this industry?Are you insane? I ask that semi-jokingly, but on the serious side, "government" involvement in a capitalist environment has traditionally stifled technical growth, and subsequently revenue. I can only suggest that true capitalism can solve this problem in the long run. If one provider can't live up to their SLA, change providers.
Please allow me to clarify. I am not by any means advocating goverment involvement. Perhaps my question came across as a desire which was not my intent. I merely wondered if anyone had worries that this type of issue would cause the less clued to push for government involvement (assuming the less clued person doesn't already work for the government..) Sorry for the confusion. Tim ---------------------------------------------------- Timothy M. Wolfe | Why surf when you can Sail? tim () clipper net | Join Oregon's Premier Sr. Network Engineer | Wireless Internet Provider! ClipperNet Corporation | http://www.clipper.net/ ----------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Peering Policies Tim Wolfe (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Alex Bligh (Apr 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Policies Paul Ferguson (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Tim Wolfe (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Steve Meuse (Apr 22)
- Re: Peering Policies Sean Donelan (Apr 22)