nanog mailing list archives
Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 12:57:19 -0400
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 08:44:42AM -0700, William B. Norton wrote:
Sorry for the delay in posting a response; there were issues with the nanog-post list. Who created that thing anyway ;-)
Um, you? ;-)
providers to troubleshoot, etc. The greater the dependence on interconnection, the more hardened you want that interconnection environment.
It's worth pointing out, as a sidebar to that, that the greater the dependence on interconnection, the more hardened it's _feasible_ to make that interconnection environment, assuming you've rolled your numbers right. Staying on the proper side of that curve is important... Cheers, - jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Member of the Technical Staff Buy copies of The New Hackers Dictionary. The Suncoast Freenet Give them to all your friends. Tampa Bay, Florida http://www.ccil.org/jargon/ +1 813 790 7592
Current thread:
- The future of NAPs & IXPs etignor (Apr 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The future of NAPs & IXPs etignor (Apr 15)
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs etignor (Apr 15)
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs William B. Norton (Apr 19)
- Message not available
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 19)
- Message not available
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs Vadim Antonov (Apr 19)
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs William B. Norton (Apr 19)
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs John Leong (Apr 19)
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs William B. Norton (Apr 19)
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs Vadim Antonov (Apr 19)
- Message not available
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 20)
- Message not available
- Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs David Diaz (Apr 22)