nanog mailing list archives
Re: Check this out
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () nacs net>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 22:05:02 -0400
On Tue, Sep 01, 1998 at 08:36:12PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
Well, the article also said that charging by the packet is "outrageous", which if I followed some of the BBN/GTE thread, was exactly what some were proposing. I think its only a matter of time before the PSTN and the Internet are one and the same, and regulated by PUC's. So I'd have to think also that either the concept of "long distance" will change, or perhaps something as crazy as per packet, long distance internet charges will come into existance.
Yeahbut when the call originates at Customer X's premises and terminates at a phone number that is local to Customer X, it is rather silly to talk about long distance charges. The fact that someone is endorsing exactly that is what is "embarrassingly stupid." Oh, Sure... down the road when we're all talking over IP networks instead of the PSTN, things may change. But that's not the case now. -- "You know, I've decided lizards aren't too smart." --Me, to "Junior", one of my iguanas
Current thread:
- Check this out James B. Slayden Jr. (Sep 01)
- Re: Check this out Tim Wolfe (Sep 01)
- Re: Check this out Paul Ferguson (Sep 01)
- Re: Check this out David Brouda (Sep 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Check this out Dean Anderson (Sep 01)
- Re: Check this out Steven J. Sobol (Sep 01)
- RE: Check this out jeyers (Sep 02)