nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
From: Stephen Sprunk <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 14:46:40 -0500
Considering that the Last-Modified time on the Tongan consulate page is May 20, 1998, I'd bet that it was a server configuration error that has been corrected in the last 24 hours. The images on that page don't look like they were thrown together in response to your allegations, IMO. It has already been stated that the sfconsulate.gov.to is located at Best's server colocation facilities, which means it's probably on the same box as many other web servers. Such servers often have config problems, and that was probably brought to the attention of the folks at Best. I smell no fish. Stephen Barry Shein wrote:
Apparently it's been changed in the past 24 hours, probably as a result of this discussion. I'm sure others here checked it out and found what I found, ads for a software company, you're the first one to report otherwise (and yes right now it does seem to suddenly say something about Tonga.) I smell something fishy going on here.
-- | | Stephen Sprunk, KD5DWP, CCIE #3723 :|: :|: NSA, Network Consulting Engineer :|||: :|||: 14875 Landmark Blvd #400; Dallas, TX .:|||||||:..:|||||||:. Pager: 800-365-4578 / 800-901-6078 C I S C O S Y S T E M S Email: ssprunk () cisco com
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? John Harkin (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? John Harkin (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? scott w (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Barry's accusation of fraud (was Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?) J.D. Falk (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Michael Dillon (Oct 02)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Rich Sena (Oct 10)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? John Harkin (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Stephen Sprunk (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Stephen Sprunk (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jared Mauch (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? mikem (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Rich Sena (Oct 10)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Michael Dillon (Oct 02)