nanog mailing list archives
Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET
From: Eric Dean <edean () gip net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 11:48:00 -0400 (EDT)
You could also order a larger circuit with the same FR paramters. On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Elvis wrote:
We also had some odd problems with our FR. When the circuit was nearing full congestion the LMI wouldn't get through and the cascade would react by bouncing the circuit (which bounced the BGP, etc. etc.). We finally had to shutoff LMI which causes us problems any time they decide to re-do the circuit for any reason....Uhh...I think that LMI gets priority over any other data...so the PVC bouncing sounds like something else is causing LMI to stop flowing. But maybe I am wrong. Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET elezar (Oct 20)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Elvis (Oct 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Phillip Vandry (Oct 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Eric Dean (Oct 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET elezar (Oct 23)
- Re: Frame Relay encap vis-a-vis point-to-point at UUNET Elvis (Oct 23)