nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use)
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () DOMINO ORG>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:49:08 +0100 (BST)
Hakan Hansson wrote (on Oct 14):Either you have to configure next-hop-self or use static or use other IGP, otherwise you'll end up with flapping routes in your network. BGP cannot use a route for next-hop-self address derived by itself, as far as I know.Well it does and can. But then I suppose it depends on the arbitrary restrictions certain vendors place on you.
GateD can with group type internal, IOS can't. GateD with group type routing requires an IGP running. In this instance you aren't running BGP as your IGP you are running ARP and static routes as an IGP. Regards, Neil. -- Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. Domino: In the glow of the night. neil () DOMINO ORG NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>
Current thread:
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Sean M. Doran (Oct 14)
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Chrisy Luke (Oct 14)
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Hakan Hansson (Oct 14)
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Chrisy Luke (Oct 14)
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Neil J. McRae (Oct 15)
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Hakan Hansson (Oct 14)
- Re: BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Chrisy Luke (Oct 14)