nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
From: Tom Pinard <tomp () ans net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 10:50:27 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:
We now return you to TongaV8, in progress.. ^^^^^^^ KarlWhats this mean?? --Dean
I think that is in reference to the IPv8 discussion.... TomP
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Change begins with the self (was Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?) J.D. Falk (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Who makes policy?, was (Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely , rogue and should be removed?) Chris Kilbourn (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Peter Stemwedel (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Dean Anderson (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Dean Anderson (Oct 02)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Tom Pinard (Oct 02)