nanog mailing list archives
Re: Despamming wholesale dialup
From: Phil Howard <phil () whistler intur net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 17:45:52 -0600 (CST)
Dean Anderson wrote:
Give it a rest. You won't be stopping spam. Dream on if you like. But take it off Nanog.
While spam is applicable to Nanog where it applies to the networking, which it does when dealing with certain issues like blocking networks and ports, this thread has "degraded" into general spam discussions. We really didn't come up with any great solutions. We will each do what we feel works best to do what we each feel needs to be done. While I disagree with Dean's assertion, I will go along with him about taking the spam discussion off Nanog. We've had our thrill. Let's go on with other things. -- -- *-----------------------------* Phil Howard KA9WGN * -- -- | Inturnet, Inc. | Director of Internet Services | -- -- | Business Internet Solutions | eng at intur.net | -- -- *-----------------------------* philh at intur.net * --
Current thread:
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup, (continued)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Phil Howard (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Derek Balling (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup J.D. Falk (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Dean Anderson (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Ray Everett-Church (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Dalvenjah FoxFire (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Steven J. Sobol (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Ray Everett-Church (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Dean Anderson (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Dean Anderson (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Phil Howard (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Steven J. Sobol (Oct 30)
- Re: Despamming wholesale dialup Dean Anderson (Oct 30)