nanog mailing list archives
RE: CISCO Easter Egg
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:21:40 -0800
| Not only interesting, but dishonest. Forcing a company to spend money on | false premise is tantamount to theft or conversion. That cisco gives them | the opportunity for doing so is aiding an abetting. Particularly so when | the upgrade cost adds to cisco's revenue. In other words, I sincerely hope | that you are joking. Yes, I'm a "suit" and only a part-time | operator/developer these days. I think you should apply for various open positions in operations management in several large telco-owned U.S.-based ISPs. There was no charge, btw, for moving from one beta to another beta when you had smartnet-style or per-chassis support contracts of the type all of the organizations involved had at the time. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg, (continued)
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg Scott Mace (Oct 29)
- RE: CISCO Easter Egg Martin, Christian (Oct 29)
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg Steven J. Sobol (Oct 29)
- RE: CISCO Easter Egg Roeland M.J. Meyer (Oct 29)
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg Tony Li (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 30)
- RE: CISCO Easter Egg Martin, Christian (Oct 29)
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg Richard Irving (Oct 29)
- RE: CISCO Easter Egg Bill Woodcock (Oct 29)
- Re: CISCO Easter Egg John Mammen (Oct 29)
- RE: CISCO Easter Egg Sean M. Doran (Oct 29)
- RE: CISCO Easter Egg Sean M. Doran (Oct 29)