RE: time for a new list?

[Chad Skidmore <cskidmor () nwnexus net>]

The other problem is how to identify what is appropriate and what is
not.  It does not seem difficult to find folks on the list who do not
agree so it could be tough to appoint the NANOG god that strikes people
from the list.

Oh well, I guess I'll just keep making good use of my mail filters to
catch the garbage.  :-)

---------------------------------------------
Chad Skidmore
Director of Network Engineering
Northwest Nexus, Inc.
http://www.nwnexus.com
1-888-NWNEXUS


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Kozowski [mailto:eric () haydenisland verio net]
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 7:59 PM
> To: Joe Shaw
> Cc: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: time for a new list?
>
>
> At 07:01 PM 11/2/98 , Joe  Shaw wrote:
> > I think moderating the group might not be such a bad idea.  The only
> > problem with this would be getting someone who had enough 
> time to actually
> > moderate the list.  I don't know what is going on lately, 
> but it seems
> > egos and animosity are running rampant on both inet-access 
> and nanog.  I
> > have been caught up in it myself, and for that I apologize.
>
> i didn't, and don't, propose a moderated list.  i propose a 
> list with some
> sort of subscription requirement, at least for the ability 
> post, that will
> only allow nano's to post.  i also propose that the list be 
> stringently
> policed.  one warning re: content of your postings, then your 
> ability to
> post is revoked.
>
> i'd like to see a list that lives up to the intent of the 
> nanog list, but
> w/o all the useless drivel and chatter.  if i wanted that, 
> i'd still be
> subscribed to inet-access.
>
> --
> Eric Kozowski                
> eric () haydenisland verio net  
> Non carborundum illigitimi