nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Great Exchange


From: miquels () cistron nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Date: 29 May 1998 17:42:34 +0200

In article <199805291432.KAA29721 () jekyll piermont com>,
Perry E. Metzger <perry () piermont com> wrote:
There is no good long term reason for metered internet usage at the
end user level, and there is also considerable market pressure against 
it.

OK, NANOG means North American ... etc, but do you have _any_ idea
what connectivity _to_ the US costs?

"The" internet backbone has traditionally been the USA. So foreigners
payed for a line to connect to the US and the US got connectivity to
Europe, Japan etc basically for free. But that is changing.

So for high speed access to destinations outside a country one would
need to meter that. With 28k8 access, there's no real need, but once
an end user gets the possibility to use his 2Mbit/sec ADSL line to
download at full speed from, say, Europe, you're looking at a different
picture.

Mike.
-- 
 Miquel van Smoorenburg | Our vision is to speed up time,
    miquels () cistron nl  |   eventually eliminating it.


Current thread: