nanog mailing list archives
Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic
From: "John Golovich" <john () shutter net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 14:01:43 +0000
On the topic of exchange traffic. Is it necessary for both parties who will be exchanging traffic to have an as number?
From what I understand in order to have the routes announced to the
internet this will be needed. Sorry for the primative question.
Current thread:
- different thinking on exchanging traffic Jonathan Arneault (May 22)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Michael Dillon (May 22)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic DAVE NORDLUND (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic John Golovich (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Alan Hannan (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic John Golovich (May 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Sean M. Doran (May 22)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tim Salo (May 22)
- Message not available
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Jay R. Ashworth (May 23)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Tom Perrine (May 26)
- Message not available
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Sean Donelan (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Damian O'Gorman (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic dirk (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Greg A. Woods (May 26)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 27)
- Re: different thinking on exchanging traffic Damian O'Gorman (May 26)