nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP & CIDR blocks
From: "Jason L. Weisberger" <jweis () softaware com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 20:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Is it unreasonable of me to think it's awfully backwards of ANS.NET to require anyone getting a new CIDR block to physically call ANS's NOC and say "please listen to routes for this block from this AS"?
They obviously care even less about their network than we were previously led to belive. -- Jason Weisberger Chief Technology Officer SoftAware, Inc. - 310/305-0275 "Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees." -Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson
Current thread:
- BGP & CIDR blocks Jon Lewis (May 06)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Randy Bush (May 06)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Jason L. Weisberger (May 06)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Al Reuben (May 06)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Rob Skrobola (May 06)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Randy Bush (May 06)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Jon Lewis (May 08)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks davidk (May 08)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Network Operations Center (May 10)
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks davidk (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BGP & CIDR blocks Sean Donelan (May 06)