nanog mailing list archives

Re: renumbering and roaming


From: Paul Mansfield <paulm () uk psi com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 09:40:23 +0100 (BST)


On Mon, 18 May 1998, Daniel Reed wrote:
) Nah, good idea, but too many useful services with port numbers > 255, so

I think this seems nice, but gets complex, and as said breaks things, although
you could use the full range of a /16.

However, we'd really want TWO of everything, on different networks if possible
to give resilience, hence why I proposed
        x.y.z.2 -> resolver
        x.y.z-1.2 -> resolver

Paul
----
P Mansfield, Senior SysAdmin PSINet, +44-1223-577577x2611/577611 fax:577600 
*** If a grand piano had a rubout key, I'd be a concert pianist by now! ***






Current thread: