nanog mailing list archives
RE: renumbering and roaming
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 12:49:22 +0100
Then we have a special /24 or so that is in another RFC that is "service provider independent service addresses". Allocate it out of the swamp (192.x.x.x for those too young) and treat it just like private address space, but the convention is that no one uses it for "corporate" addressing. Peter
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Ben Buxton Sent: Monday, May 18, 1998 1:23 PM To: Paul Mansfield; Michael Dillon Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: renumbering and roaming On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 10:59:16AM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote:On Sun, 17 May 1998, Michael Dillon turned on his computer and typed:On Sun, 17 May 1998, Michael K. Smith: IMHO every dialup customer from every ISP in the world should use 192.168.254.1 for their DNS address and this number should behard codedas the default in all client software. Then this problemwould go away.if all ISPs agreed to use these addresses... say - TWO resolvers, e.g. 192.168.254,1 and 192.168.253.1 - two mail relays, e.g. 192.168.254.5 and 192.168.253.5 - two news servers, e.g. ---254.9 and 253.9 - two ntp time servers - etc etcOf course, if a customer has a LAN out the back of the same machine they're connecting from, and it's using these addresses (which they are entitled to use), then it'll cause immense headaches.. -- Ben Buxton___bb () zip com.au_____ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L Zip's Network Dude /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Carbon: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288 Paper: 92475276 v the best :)
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks?, (continued)
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks? Alex Bligh (May 17)
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks? Michael K. Smith (May 17)
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks? Michael Dillon (May 17)
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks? Blake Willis (May 17)
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks? Michael Shields (May 18)
- renumbering and roaming Paul Mansfield (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Ben Buxton (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Paul Mansfield (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Dean Anderson (May 18)
- spam control (was renumbering etc) through hiding relays Paul Mansfield (May 18)
- Re: ARIN allocating /20 netblocks? Michael Dillon (May 17)
- RE: renumbering and roaming Peter Galbavy (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Blake Willis (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Paul Mansfield (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Phillip Vandry (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Daniel Reed (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Dean Anderson (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Forrest W. Christian (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Michael Dillon (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Michael S. Fischer (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Karl Denninger (May 18)
- Re: renumbering and roaming Michael S. Fischer (May 18)