nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1.1.1.0/24
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 17:07:38 -0500
Looks like PSInet is demonstrating their complete and total lack of clue again.
Who has less of a clue? A provider that announces a 1.1.1.0/24, or a provider that listens to junk like 1.1.1.0/24? It doesn't matter what junk is announced, *IF* you could get providers not to listen to it. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation
Current thread:
- 1.1.1.0/24 SASAKI Kazuyoshi (May 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 John Fraizer - Administrator (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Klaus Landefeld (May 13)
- 12.0.0.0/8 Jay Borkenhagen (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Ben Buxton (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Ben Buxton (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 andrew khoo (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Klaus Landefeld (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 13)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Michael Dillon (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dean Robb (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Jeremy Porter (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Michael Dillon (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dean Robb (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Karl Denninger (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dean Robb (May 14)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 15)
- Re: 1.1.1.0/24 Dean Robb (May 16)