nanog mailing list archives
Re: Core router bakeoff?
From: Rob Skrobola <rjs () ans net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 11:20:42 -0400
>Subject: Re: Core router bakeoff? >AFAIK there is no such thing as a PIPE-150, and if you have proxy >arp switched on then you might see this behavour. You did read >the manual ? :-) > >I use the GRF-400 and it works well, Although I agree that Ascends current >support management is completely broken. As for Ethernet, in my experience >if you push anything near to 100M you should really spend the extra cash >on FDDI, it works far better. The POS card for the GRF works excellently, >you can use it as a frame relay switch, however Ascend manage to do >stupid things like break your ability to restrict AS annoucements via >AS path. sigh. Neil, We saw a rough limit of about 45k pps through the grf oc3 pos card. Have you seen better, or has it not been an issue for traffic pattern reasons or something? RobS
Current thread:
- Re: Core router bakeoff?, (continued)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Karl Denninger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Steve Sobol (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Perry E. Metzger (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Neil J. McRae (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Adam Rothschild (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Nathan Stratton (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Phil Howard (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Rob Skrobola (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jason L. Weisberger (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jon Lewis (May 10)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Blake Willis (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jon Green (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Richard Welty (May 08)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Scott Weeks (May 07)
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Rob M VanHooren (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Core router bakeoff? Jay R. Ashworth (May 07)