nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft NOC?
From: Robert Sanders <rsanders () mindspring net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 12:12:32 -0400
The reason it is imperative that there be a telephone number for an ISP is that it's really hard to use e-mail to contact an ISP if the network connectivity to the ISP is not working.
This ought to make one a little less sanguine about the prospect of unifying the packet data and voice networks in a "one pipe carries it all" model. I suppose there's always smoke signals. regards, -- Robert
Current thread:
- Microsoft NOC? Kit Knox (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Reid B. Fishler (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Derek Balling (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Gary E. Miller (May 08)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft NOC? Kurt Parent (May 07)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Robert Sanders (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Justin W. Newton (May 08)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Deepak Jain (May 11)
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Kevin Oberman (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Microsoft NOC? Jay R. Ashworth (May 08)