nanog mailing list archives
Re: More smurf fun
From: "Scott Gifford" <sgifford () tir com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 17:37:25 -0500
Here's the latest group of smurf-able networks. Note some cool, high-connectivity networks are on here, like Bay Networks. At least one was still active on mae-west, if you can believe it.
[ ... ] Is there any good reason I shouldn't ask my upstream network providers to filter all packets coming in to our network with one of these source addresses? And is there any good reason this wouldn't very effectively prevent us from being a Smurf target? Thanks for any thoughts/info, ------Scott.
Current thread:
- More smurf fun Dave Rand (Mar 08)
- Re: More smurf fun Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: More smurf fun Jeffrey Haas (Mar 09)
- Re: More smurf fun Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 10)
- Re: More smurf fun Scott Gifford (Mar 10)
- Re: More smurf fun Hank Nussbacher (Mar 10)
- Re: More smurf fun Ing. Alejandro Perea Mejia (Mar 11)
- Re: More smurf fun Jon Lewis (Mar 11)
- Message not available
- Re: More smurf fun Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 12)
- Re: More smurf fun Hank Nussbacher (Mar 10)