nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic hosage (fwd)
From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 00:44:09 +0000
However, the point has been completely missed here, Eric. The point Dal was making is that Perhaps.youwant.to FALSIFIED, LIED, FORGED, STOLE, MISAPPROPRIATED, and otherwise BS'd about their WhoIs entry:
I think the world is missing something (*). ".to" is the TLD registered to Tonga. They are doing a nice line in registering domain names thankyou. Internic/NSI's whois server is not authorative for them. You thus get the same result querying whois.internic.lnet as if you (say) query something in the UK domain. That is it returns the record if and only if a host entry has been registered. It happens that this domain has a host record different from the DNS record, along with about ten trillion other incorrect host records in the Internic database. This is easilly achieved by modifying your zonefile after the host entry has been registered. If I remember correctly there is a well known bug that no host entries are fully checked anyway, but this is by the by. So I don't quite know how this is an exploit. (*) = or I am. -- Alex Bligh GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)
Current thread:
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Robb (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dalvenjah FoxFire (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Alex Bligh (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Michael Dillon (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Alex Bligh (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Chris Josephes (Mar 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Alex Bligh (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dalvenjah FoxFire (Mar 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Robb (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Robb (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Anderson (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Dean Anderson (Mar 21)
- Re: Internic hosage (fwd) Randy Bush (Mar 21)