nanog mailing list archives
Re: So, 11.3 anyone?
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 16:51:44 +0000
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 08:56:52 +0100 (MET) Christian Kratzer <ck () toplink net> wrote: Geez, and I though Ascend was bad for differing release, Peter, shall we kick of a thread about that here? :-) Sigh, Neil.
HiSo, a potential reason came up for me to possibly run 11.3. I really don't want to, but I am comtemplating it. Apparently, 11.3 has code to fast-switch policy-routed networks. Does it work? Is 11.3 really usable? I am scared to death, but may need this for a certain application.we are running policy routing on our 3640 and 7206 machines and we quite fine
without fast switched policy routing. I would only think of using it if the cpu overhead starts getting unconformatably high. At the moment we are running 112-11.P without any major tilts. Greetings Christian Kratzer Toplink -- TopLink GbR, Internet Services info () toplink net Christian Kratzer http://www.toplink.net/ Phone: +49 7032 2701-0 Fax: +49 7032 2701-19 FreeBSD spoken here!
-- Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. neil () DOMINO ORG NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>
Current thread:
- So, 11.3 anyone? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 11)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Peter Galbavy (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Christian Kratzer (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? jlixfeld (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 12)
- NetSpeed FireRunner 100 Dax Kelson (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? jlixfeld (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex P. Rudnev (Mar 12)
- Re: So, 11.3 anyone? Alex Rubenstein (Mar 12)