nanog mailing list archives
Re: Digex transparent proxying
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:36:47 -0700
Patrick Gilmore wrote:
I find it repugnant that one of my peers has done so.
On an operational note, it seems that Priori has just indicated that it wishes to terminate its peering with Digex. I don't suppose anyone knows which way the packets between those two networks will flow once this principled demonstration of revulsion has been implemented? Sean. (prepared to be told by Randy Bush to contact the DIGEX NOC since Ebone is a customer of Digex's in cooperation with ACONET; not that it matters, since the ASes behind Priori are probably not very crucial)
Current thread:
- Re: Digex transparent proxying, (continued)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 28)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 28)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Roeland M.J. Meyer (Jun 28)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Chris Fournier (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Jon Lewis (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Chris A. Icide (Jun 30)