nanog mailing list archives
Re: transparent caching....
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () wisdom rc vix com>
Date: 26 Jun 1998 17:22:45 -0700
mo () UU NET (Mike O'Dell) writes:
I've been talking myself blue in the face for some time now trying to convince the never-ending parade of would-be cache builders that busting a gut to be "completely transparent" was simply not worth the effort because i was convinced it would turn out to be a bug and not a feature, especially when people had to troubleshoot problems.
I have come to agree with this, in the large. But it was and remains an interesting technical problem, and I feel strongly and proudly that our box was the only one that got it *right*. -- Paul Vixie La Honda, CA "Many NANOG members have been around <paul () vix com> longer than most." --Jim Fleming pacbell!vixie!paul (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)
Current thread:
- transparent caching.... Mike O'Dell (Jun 26)
- Re: transparent caching.... Paul Vixie (Jun 26)
- Re: transparent caching.... Richard Irving (Jun 27)
- Re: transparent caching.... Paul Vixie (Jun 26)