nanog mailing list archives
Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 04:15:50 -0700
| Yeah, it tells you when to change vendors. Yeah, to Digex, if you're an end user who doesn't want to try to share your ISP's bottlenecks with hordes of "mice" traffic in the form of short HTML transactions which react so badly to congestion en masse that other flows likely never reach equilibrium. In short, if you want to run a VPN and have a decent degree of performance, look to an ISP who either _really_ does no overbooking (rather than just says so) or who overbooks but who uses this kind of mandatory caching scheme and RED in combination. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking, (continued)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking alex (Jun 26)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Rich Sena (Jun 26)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Michael Dillon (Jun 26)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Patrick McManus (Jun 29)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Hank Nussbacher (Jun 27)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Jeremy Porter (Jun 27)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 28)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Jeremy Porter (Jun 28)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking alex (Jun 26)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Jon Lewis (Jun 26)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Jeremy Porter (Jun 28)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking Paul Vixie (Jun 30)
- Re: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking czmok (Jun 30)