nanog mailing list archives
Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR)
From: Taner Halicioglu <taner () isi net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 23:32:20 -0700
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 01:16:14PM -0400, Richard Thomas <buglord () ex-pressnet com> wrote:
The biggest I've ever found is 12.79.237.0, depending on the host you ping it from you can get between 900-1200 dupes, all from 12.79.237.1 which reverses to 1.new-york-60rs.ny.dial-access.att.net. I've mailed at&t about this several times and have gotten no response.
wow.. that ruled... taner@coredump:~ >wc FILE 7804 78004 823296 FILE that was from a ping 12.79.237.0 | grep 'seq=0' | tee FILE, and I waited until it stopped scrolling (and them some for good measure). good lord... I got some of these, too: taner@coredump:~ >grep "Time to live exceeded" FILE | sort | uniq -c 14 packet seq=0 bounced at 199.70.3.198: Time to live exceeded 7 packet seq=0 bounced at 199.70.3.200: Time to live exceeded 7 packet seq=0 bounced at 199.70.3.201: Time to live exceeded 7 packet seq=0 bounced at 199.70.3.202: Time to live exceeded *shrug* Anyone from AT&T listening? :) -Taner
Current thread:
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Oystein Homelien (Jun 15)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Paul Mansfield (Jun 16)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Brandon Ross (Jun 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Richard Thomas (Jun 15)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Taner Halicioglu (Jun 15)
- Re: smurf amp nets, the registry (SAR) Paul Mansfield (Jun 16)